(11-14-2016, 12:35 PM)VictorMAngoStein Wrote: I mean, if we had something like vaccines having a small chance to give some sort of in-game Asperger's I wouldn't mind that either, but I digress.
I thought we did. At least, the wiki mentioned a disease called space autism that made you sneer at things.
It was removed, probably because it was tasteless.
Quote: if sperg jokes get banned
No one is advocating this position, that i'm aware of. Banning a thing and making it policy not to have those kinds of jokes in-game are different.
Quote:Plus it's generally assumed that anyone who plays SS13 is an aspie by default
No it isn't? This joke seems to me in poor taste, given the subject matter.
TheNewTeddy Wrote:There's an argument that this is somehow ableism, but there's no evidence provided at all.
Making fun of someone for, or making light of, or making use of in a pejorative manner, a mental or physical disability is ableism. To what extent does it do harm? In this case, probably very little. However, calling people spergs is ableist because it makes use of a derogatory slur for people on the autism spectrum.
Quote:A - this is somehow offensive, when nobody has yet explained how or why
and
B - these terms are thus equal to other 'bad words'
A - It has been, several times, regardless of whether or not you agree. Offense is something taken, not given. You can't argue that someone else didn't find something offensive.
B - No one argued that they're equal to other slurs. The primary argument seems to have been "it's not really consistent to ban certain slurs but then have items in the game with slurs as part of their names."
Quote:again, we compare these bullshit words that are not even offensive to words that everyone here agrees actually are offensive.
Comparisons of structure =/= comparisons of impact. "A punch is like a bullet in that it is violent and hurts" is not to say that punches and bullets are somehow equitable; but if you wouldn't shoot someone because it's violent and it hurts, then it'd be inconsistent with those values to punch someone instead (without good reason).
Quote:Again, this, from my experience in online asperger communities, is untrue. Aspie is not an offensive term. I've even met up in person with people who have aspergers, and our group was called "aspies"
Personally, i've never really known the word "aspie" outside of an offensive or patronizing manner. If you say it's not a slur, maybe i just don't know, but it could also be like "queer" in that people in the queer community refer to themselves as such all the time, and it's still a slur to call someone a queer. Intent in this case would matter, and in the case of online correspondence where intent can't be judged because there isn't enough information, people will get hurt.
Quote:If this is how people really feel, just remove all of it. I really don't care. If my opinion does not matter, then why the fuck was a thread made asking me what that opinion is.
Of course your opinion matters; this is a community of people, and communities work with each other and talk to each other and come together to discuss disagreements.
Even if your opinion is ultimately not validated, it doesn't mean it won't have been considered.
This is why i've participated in this discussion. I know to reasonable certainty that my opinion isn't ultimately going to change anyone's mind, but I know that at least some people here have or will have considered it, and that's what being a community is about. Considering everyone's opinion and coming to a decision as a group.