Posts: 1,174
Threads: 73
Joined: Sep 2014
Sundance Wrote:Roomba Wrote:It's less because fireball gibs people and more because fireball creates an explosion, and any kind of explosion will gib a dead body. Maybe fireball should be changed so it creates fire, but doesn't explode.
As an addendum, I too would like to see fireball changed to no explosion but instead more like a blast 4x4 fireball blast that can ignite several people at a time. Getting hit directly with the fireball should do some direct burn damage.
So basically incendiary grenades but with some direct projectile damage? I can dig that.
Posts: 2,064
Threads: 42
Joined: Feb 2013
BYOND Username: Ed Venture
I'm down for fireball getting nerfed (shocking right?) Last wizard round I had it was pretty much a instant kill to the people getting hit with it
Posts: 593
Threads: 35
Joined: Dec 2013
Sorry to Hijack the thread a tiny bit but since we are talking about useless spells that need a buff how about bullcharge?
It's stupidly obvious in what it does and it's path can be avoided by steping one square away. When it DOES hit someone it has a stupidly short stun and low damage compared to the auto-track fireball of death
Posts: 2,552
Threads: 33
Joined: Oct 2014
I think some of the balancing could be solved by rebalancing the telecrystal allowances and costs. Instead of straight up 1 tc for 1 spell, each spell could have it's own cost depending on it's relative power. This would allow for another dimension of control in regards to buffing and nerfing a spell. Though from a style point I'd be more partial to calling them levels instead of telecrystals. Not quite DnD, but closer to nerdom.
Posts: 2,722
Threads: 143
Joined: Sep 2012
BYOND Username: Powmonkey
Vitatroll Wrote:I think some of the balancing could be solved by rebalancing the telecrystal allowances and costs. Instead of straight up 1 tc for 1 spell, each spell could have it's own cost depending on it's relative power. This would allow for another dimension of control in regards to buffing and nerfing a spell. Though from a style point I'd be more partial to calling them levels instead of telecrystals. Not quite DnD, but closer to nerdom.
This seems like the best solution in my opinion.
Posts: 638
Threads: 72
Joined: Jun 2014
Honestly, I really don't see the problem turning it to a zombie. It is still harder to get than the golems, which are real strong as it is, and has a higher cooldown. The whole point of wizard is to be OP. It's a wizman vs the entire crew, and they will absolutely mob them. Wizard is supposed to be OP, nerfing it makes it less fun. This spell clearly needs a buff. This proposed buff makes it at least someone close to golem. It's a simple change and adds more diversity. Nerfing other spells is not the point.
Posts: 359
Threads: 9
Joined: Apr 2014
If skeletons are too frail for what it takes to make them, why not just make them more durable?
Posts: 5,708
Threads: 303
Joined: May 2014
I'll say it again, just have the spell reanimate defeated skeletons.
Posts: 638
Threads: 72
Joined: Jun 2014
Problem is people will just hide the skeletons. Also the problem stands that one golem hits harder and lasts longer than a skeleton, and explodes into its chemical, and also is more frequently useable.