Posts: 1,174
	Threads: 73
	Joined: Sep 2014
	
	
 
	
	
		Sundance Wrote:Roomba Wrote:It's less because fireball gibs people and more because fireball creates an explosion, and any kind of explosion will gib a dead body. Maybe fireball should be changed so it creates fire, but doesn't explode.
As an addendum, I too would like to see fireball changed to no explosion but instead more like a blast 4x4 fireball blast that can ignite several people at a time. Getting hit directly with the fireball should do some direct burn damage.
So basically incendiary grenades but with some direct projectile damage?  I can dig that.
	
 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,064
	Threads: 42
	Joined: Feb 2013
	
BYOND Username: Ed Venture 
	
 
	
	
		I'm down for fireball getting nerfed (shocking right?) Last wizard round I had it was pretty much a instant kill to the people getting hit with it
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 593
	Threads: 35
	Joined: Dec 2013
	
	
 
	
	
		Sorry to Hijack the thread a tiny bit but since we are talking about useless spells that need a buff how about bullcharge?
It's stupidly obvious in what it does and it's path can be avoided by steping one square away. When it DOES hit someone it has a stupidly short stun and low damage compared to the auto-track fireball of death
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,552
	Threads: 33
	Joined: Oct 2014
	
	
 
	
	
		I think some of the balancing could be solved by rebalancing the telecrystal allowances and costs. Instead of straight up 1 tc for 1 spell, each spell could have it's own cost depending on it's relative power. This would allow for another dimension of control in regards to buffing and nerfing a spell. Though from a style point I'd be more partial to calling them levels instead of telecrystals. Not quite DnD, but closer to nerdom.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,722
	Threads: 143
	Joined: Sep 2012
	
BYOND Username: Powmonkey
	
 
	
	
		Vitatroll Wrote:I think some of the balancing could be solved by rebalancing the telecrystal allowances and costs. Instead of straight up 1 tc for 1 spell, each spell could have it's own cost depending on it's relative power. This would allow for another dimension of control in regards to buffing and nerfing a spell. Though from a style point I'd be more partial to calling them levels instead of telecrystals. Not quite DnD, but closer to nerdom.
This seems like the best solution in my opinion.
	
 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 637
	Threads: 72
	Joined: Jun 2014
	
	
 
	
	
		Honestly, I really don't see the problem turning it to a zombie.   It is still harder to get than the golems, which are real strong as it is, and has a higher cooldown.  The whole point of wizard is to be OP.  It's a wizman vs the entire crew, and they will absolutely mob them.   Wizard is supposed to be OP, nerfing it makes it less fun.   This spell clearly needs a buff.  This proposed buff makes it at least someone close to golem.     It's a simple change  and adds more diversity.   Nerfing other spells is not the point.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 359
	Threads: 9
	Joined: Apr 2014
	
	
 
	
	
		If skeletons are too frail for what it takes to make them, why not just make them more durable?
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 5,856
	Threads: 308
	Joined: May 2014
	
	
 
	
	
		I'll say it again, just have the spell reanimate defeated skeletons.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 637
	Threads: 72
	Joined: Jun 2014
	
	
 
	
	
		Problem is people will just hide the skeletons.  Also the problem stands that one golem hits harder and lasts longer than a skeleton, and explodes into its chemical, and also is more frequently useable.