01-12-2016, 06:22 AM
TheOnlyRyan Wrote:Super amazing chemists will simply not fuck up, it wont be making chemistry more OP at all.It's impossible to outright ruin a beaker of chem. Even if you accidentally end up with an extra reagent, that doesn't make your mix any less dangerous, it just means you can administer less of the core chems at once. That's not a concern for "training chemists" as the mix is still plenty usable, and if you're obsessed enough to be concerned about maximizing yields then you're obsessed enough to dump the beaker and start over anyway. Besides, how often does that actually happen anyway? Chem is dead simple when it comes to amounts and sizes most of the time, there's only a few things that are anything besides 1:1. 90% of the use these things see is going to be scientists separating the fillers out of Discount Dan's for an easy exotic deathmix, and 8% is going to be lucky or robust botanists breaking into chem to use it to keep both outputs from multi-reagent plant mutations.
It will just help training chemists to not make so many mistakes, as they can easily learn and improve the next time.
They won't just ruin their entire beaker and say screw it, press the red X and go braindead.
Boy I wish we could edit posts :l