Goonhub
02-27-2018, 03:23 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-27-2018, 03:26 PM by Haprenti. Edited 1 time in total.)
To me the fact that you can kill an antag who's done nothing except maybe reveal himself as one somehow shouldn't be a thing.
If your response to that is "What should I do then wait for them to kill someone ? He's allowed to do it", then what can I say ? It's clearly metagaming. Taken straight from the wiki : "Don't use information you shouldn't have".
You shouldn't know someone having some contraband item (idk, a jug of moonshine, a cloaker or something non directly lethal) is going to kill someone, if at all. Security can deal with that.
"But there's no security" then roll security officer in the first place instead of spending half a round lurking around for antags.
"But they have it rough" tough luck, get respected, but if you're in for the kills you should have it rough in the first place.
EDIT : That's for hypervigilentes, if you're not one you can obviously complain about possible lack of security.
If your response to that is "What should I do then wait for them to kill someone ? He's allowed to do it", then what can I say ? It's clearly metagaming. Taken straight from the wiki : "Don't use information you shouldn't have".
You shouldn't know someone having some contraband item (idk, a jug of moonshine, a cloaker or something non directly lethal) is going to kill someone, if at all. Security can deal with that.
"But there's no security" then roll security officer in the first place instead of spending half a round lurking around for antags.
"But they have it rough" tough luck, get respected, but if you're in for the kills you should have it rough in the first place.
EDIT : That's for hypervigilentes, if you're not one you can obviously complain about possible lack of security.