Posts: 69
Threads: 11
Joined: Apr 2013
12-17-2018, 08:26 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-17-2018, 08:54 AM by Doctor Zaius. Edited 1 time in total.)
Having all the space travel devices being off-limits kind of sucks.
e: Yeah, to expand, I understand why the pod locks are there on 1 (to encourage players to stay on station so they interact more), and I'm pretty sure them being there on 2 is probably just an unintended consequence of the map rotation system. If there's any way to remove them on 2 while keeping them on 1 that's probably optimal.
Posts: 274
Threads: 18
Joined: Nov 2017
BYOND Username: Eibel
If there is a way to set it so that G1 still retains the pod locks, while G2 loses them, I would agree.
I don't know if it is or not so that's my two cents.
Posts: 807
Threads: 47
Joined: Mar 2015
BYOND Username: Recusor
12-17-2018, 10:30 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-17-2018, 10:30 AM by Recusor. Edited 1 time in total.)
I wholeheartedly agree, podlocks on 2 are non-fun imo.
Posts: 69
Threads: 3
Joined: Mar 2018
BYOND Username: CandleCandleCandles
In my opinion, restrictions breed creativity.
Differences between say the cogs and clarion like that are very good to me.
Changes up a bit your foreplanning and improvisation.
I never quite liked the fact that on the cogs somebody being pursued can just easily hop in a pod and screw off indefinitely, never to be found. At least make em work ahead a bit if they plan to make a getaway, at least on some maps.
Said differences being good is why, despite me liking pod locks on Clarion/Destiny, I wouldn't like every map to have them.
Posts: 1,716
Threads: 74
Joined: Aug 2017
BYOND Username: Wisecrack34
Character Name: Ereven Nailo
Maybe make pod locks have the same hacking as chests, with the failure instead causing the pod's "car" alarm to blare
Posts: 2,722
Threads: 143
Joined: Sep 2012
BYOND Username: Powmonkey
(12-17-2018, 01:59 PM)CandleCandleCandles Wrote: In my opinion, restrictions breed creativity.
This isn't a restriction though, it's just an inconvenience.
It's trivially easy to break into a pod given a couple of minutes.
Posts: 5,710
Threads: 303
Joined: May 2014
(12-17-2018, 02:07 PM)Wisecrack34 Wrote: Maybe make pod locks have the same hacking as chests, with the failure instead causing the pod's "car" alarm to blare
I like the idea of an alarm that goes off. Maybe door wire hacking could be something you could do as a way to hotwire the engine
Posts: 1,716
Threads: 74
Joined: Aug 2017
BYOND Username: Wisecrack34
Character Name: Ereven Nailo
12-17-2018, 03:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-17-2018, 03:20 PM by Wisecrack34. Edited 1 time in total.)
Maybe remove locks and replace them with a pod keys that let you drive it, requiring hotwiring to get working
Posts: 69
Threads: 3
Joined: Mar 2018
BYOND Username: CandleCandleCandles
(12-17-2018, 02:51 PM)Noah Buttes Wrote: (12-17-2018, 01:59 PM)CandleCandleCandles Wrote: In my opinion, restrictions breed creativity.
This isn't a restriction though, it's just an inconvenience.
It's trivially easy to break into a pod given a couple of minutes.
It taking those minutes, even if it is easy, puts some pressure on decision making and changes foreplanning and thinking on your feet. Inconveniences restrict.
Posts: 1,716
Threads: 74
Joined: Aug 2017
BYOND Username: Wisecrack34
Character Name: Ereven Nailo
I would say "But it's not fun" but I have no way of checking to make sure this is an accurate statement due to poor circumstances (As is evident by my pfp). I would appreciate if someone were to add on to this.
Posts: 871
Threads: 99
Joined: Sep 2012
Just give the captain/sec their own locked pods and everyone else gets one with a non-activated lock they can set themselves bam