Posts: 422
Threads: 44
Joined: Oct 2014
BYOND Username: TDHooligan
Character Name: Dill Behrt
The chemicompiler takes a very long time to heat up beakers meaningfully, perhaps up the speed?
Also, some extra commands similar to + and - but with larger increments to help this? Perhaps 5/10/50 increments would be nice. I've got upwards of 100 +s in one function.
Posts: 247
Threads: 24
Joined: Oct 2013
If you have one hundred +'s in a script then you're not multiplying, try looking for ways to optimize your code. I'm definitely saying no to the increments, it would be nice but it removes some of the magic. As for heating rate, it would be nice, but at the same time you can just preheat beakers, so it's not all that necessary. I think the thing works fine as it is.
Posts: 3,082
Threads: 273
Joined: Dec 2012
the heating rate uses the same proc as the reagent heater/cooler, I think, so a buff really isn't necessary? you just can't set it to 1000 to heat something to 700, which is why you think it's slow.
Posts: 422
Threads: 44
Joined: Oct 2014
BYOND Username: TDHooligan
Character Name: Dill Behrt
Perhaps that could be changed then? If I recall from my experience it can take up to a minute to heat something a hundred or so degrees; of course it may just be lag.