Turbine automation poll

[Mikeistaken]

What form of turbine automation does everyone use? I very much like using the Multiplicative setup, however I see people all the time using an addition based setup and i don't know why. also commenting the reason why would also be good because it will be collective information on why you think one is better then the other.

Edit: Since there is some confusion about what each form looks like, I will include them in this post.

1. Multiplicative:
   • This setup is made using 2 splitter components and 2 arithmetic components.
     
   • Splitter A is set to (rpm) and splitter B is set to (stator).
     
   • Splitter A goes into arithmetic A in spot A and arithmetic A is setup so A is divided
     
   • by B (600).
     
   • The result is sent to arithmetic B.
     
   • Splitter B is connected to arithmetic B, and the arithmetic component will multiply
     
   • the results of arithmetic A and splitter B, then send it back to the turbine
     
2. Addition-based:
   • This setup is made with 1 splitter, 2 arithmetic and 1 counter.
     
   • The splitter is set to (rpm) and connected to arithmetic a under A
     
   • Arithmetic A is set to subtract B(600) from A then sent to arithmetic B
     
   • Arithmetic B is set to multiply A and B together, where one of them is from arithmetic A and another is an arbitrary number used to configure the rate of change, 500 is a common variable.
     
   • Once that's done it's sent to the counter component under "Change by" then sent back to the turbine.
     

[GARGATHUGANOKSREVENG]

I only figured out how to automate it a few months ago, I have no idea how the setup I use actually works I just memorized how to set it up, and it broke after they updated the nuclear engine.

But I'm pretty sure it was multiplicative

[Mikeistaken]

I updated to tell how each one is made for clarity

[A_Real_Cat1]

Personally i use the addition-based model because that's the one i was taught in a shift, mechcomp for the most part isn't something i want to spend my time figuring out so i just follow the steps i was taught and that's about it. Haven't tried the other one but based on the instructions in the post the addition-based one seems faster/simpler to set up.

[Angel]

I use the addition-based model because it's pretty close to some IRL automation I know using proportional controllers.

[RaccoonPope]

As you know from our IC interactions I use the addition-based variant as that was the way I was taught and it hasn’t failed me yet