![]() |
|
Turbine automation poll - Printable Version +- Goonstation Forums (https://forum.ss13.co) +-- Forum: Discussion (https://forum.ss13.co/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://forum.ss13.co/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: Turbine automation poll (/showthread.php?tid=24744) |
Turbine automation poll - Mikeistaken - 12-08-2025 What form of turbine automation does everyone use? I very much like using the Multiplicative setup, however I see people all the time using an addition based setup and i don't know why. also commenting the reason why would also be good because it will be collective information on why you think one is better then the other. Edit: Since there is some confusion about what each form looks like, I will include them in this post.
RE: Turbine automation poll - GARGATHUGANOKSREVENG - 12-09-2025 I only figured out how to automate it a few months ago, I have no idea how the setup I use actually works I just memorized how to set it up, and it broke after they updated the nuclear engine. But I'm pretty sure it was multiplicative RE: Turbine automation poll - Mikeistaken - 12-09-2025 I updated to tell how each one is made for clarity RE: Turbine automation poll - A_Real_Cat1 - 12-09-2025 Personally i use the addition-based model because that's the one i was taught in a shift, mechcomp for the most part isn't something i want to spend my time figuring out so i just follow the steps i was taught and that's about it. Haven't tried the other one but based on the instructions in the post the addition-based one seems faster/simpler to set up. RE: Turbine automation poll - Angel - 12-13-2025 I use the addition-based model because it's pretty close to some IRL automation I know using proportional controllers. RE: Turbine automation poll - RaccoonPope - 12-14-2025 As you know from our IC interactions I use the addition-based variant as that was the way I was taught and it hasn’t failed me yet |