Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
critter idea
#1
Quote:dead phillip said space slugs that leave space lube trails

if this is not a thing it should be

they would just slug around leaving space lube to trip you with behind them
#2
Only if I can ride them into battle.
#3
enforcer9 Wrote:Only if I can ride them into battle.


why not makes sense all you would need is a saddle
#4
Just make a slimy rock worm that gets out and starts lubing all the asteroids and generally being more annoying than a regular rock worm.
#5
InquisitorL Wrote:Just make a slimy rock worm that gets out and starts lubing all the asteroids and generally being more annoying than a regular rock worm.
no, that's boring and I don't want to be a miner to ride slugs.
#6
enforcer9 Wrote:
InquisitorL Wrote:Just make a slimy rock worm that gets out and starts lubing all the asteroids and generally being more annoying than a regular rock worm.
no, that's boring and I don't want to be a miner to ride slugs.
Lure slug back to the station with tasty gems
ride 'em cowboy.
#7
Why don't we just add a space rancher that can breed critters for the station?
#8
epicdwarf Wrote:Why don't we just add a space rancher that can breed critters for the station?
this has been suggested countless times, and every time we do they say no.
#9
UrsulaMejor Wrote:
epicdwarf Wrote:Why don't we just add a space rancher that can breed critters for the station?
this has been suggested countless times, and every time we do I say no.
FTFY
#10
I don't see why we shouldn't have the ability to breed animals on the station. Even if it is just on the side and doesn't have it's own job like bee keeping and pod building it would still be nice to have around.
#11
enforcer9 Wrote:
UrsulaMejor Wrote:
epicdwarf Wrote:Why don't we just add a space rancher that can breed critters for the station?
this has been suggested countless times, and every time we do I say no.
FTFY
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=602
Why would I say no when I was one of the ones who suggested it?
or are you implying that YOU said no?
I'm confused.
#12
UrsulaMejor Wrote:viewtopic.php?f=18&t=602
Why would I say no when I was one of the ones who suggested it?
or are you implying that YOU said no?
I'm confused.
You said "we" at first.

We includes me and you, along with the rest of the majority

I was for it, so "we" didn't really work. If you were for it also, it should have been "they".

cool
#13
enforcer9 Wrote:
UrsulaMejor Wrote:viewtopic.php?f=18&t=602
Why would I say no when I was one of the ones who suggested it?
or are you implying that YOU said no?
I'm confused.
You said "we" at first.

We includes me and you, along with the rest of the majority

I was for it, so "we" didn't really work. If you were for it also, it should have been "they".

cool
When he said we, he was suggesting the Gibbed community in general, not each individual opinion. Don't be an ass.
#14
Ladies and gentlemen, let us get back to the basic idea. We want critters that allow us to interact with them in fun ways. Saddles on rock worms? Maybe this can be implemented. Cats and cat toys? Why the hell not? Maybe something for bees and other critters, like... uh. George. Maybe he chases objects that are thrown around him!
#15
I'd like to see clicking George with any intent other than harm while holding rods shake the rods in front of him. Then, throwing them would cause him to chase after them and bring them back. Of course, if you tease him too much with them, he might get angry...


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)