Goonhub
04-14-2023, 08:46 PM
If this is the case, why is the specific clause about having similar events occur in the past even kept in the post?
As I'd said in the original comment - I refrained from opening a new thread because of the similarity and because of this particular clause. Would it have been better for me to open a second isolated post for the same problem, on the same server, at the same time?
I cut down what I posted to a minimum to cover explicitly the part covering this clause (the mention of it being similar, for the same complainee) - It's not like I'm throwing random events up from the past or conjecture solely to stir up controversy.
Here's the thing - I could understand the edit being made, but you also warned me as if I'd made my post in bad faith. I don't know how the warning system works but is my misinterpretation of these relatively vague rules really worth a step towards what i'm guessing is a forum ban?
As I'd said in the original comment - I refrained from opening a new thread because of the similarity and because of this particular clause. Would it have been better for me to open a second isolated post for the same problem, on the same server, at the same time?
I cut down what I posted to a minimum to cover explicitly the part covering this clause (the mention of it being similar, for the same complainee) - It's not like I'm throwing random events up from the past or conjecture solely to stir up controversy.
Here's the thing - I could understand the edit being made, but you also warned me as if I'd made my post in bad faith. I don't know how the warning system works but is my misinterpretation of these relatively vague rules really worth a step towards what i'm guessing is a forum ban?