Goonhub
06-10-2021, 12:04 PM
I don't like listing the races. Keep humans as humans, non-humans should retain the capacity for harm--it's funny.
In reality, how many AI's get away with murdering? In Barnaxi's case, The law specifically ordered the AI/Borgs to murder him.
It took advantage of his non-human status, rendering it unnecessary to override law 1. If not for that law, what are the chances they'd have killed him?
I'd find Kyle's "Sapient" and "Semi-Sapient" (obviously those below these levels would need no protection) to be agreeable.
If it's truly so important that they be protected under the law, I think this to be a fine rendition for a new lawset.
It's just funny to be a Lizard/Cow/Roach and be told, "You know, you're not human so the AI can kill you at any time."
Ultimately, It hasn't been a problem, so why make it into one.
In reality, how many AI's get away with murdering? In Barnaxi's case, The law specifically ordered the AI/Borgs to murder him.
It took advantage of his non-human status, rendering it unnecessary to override law 1. If not for that law, what are the chances they'd have killed him?
I'd find Kyle's "Sapient" and "Semi-Sapient" (obviously those below these levels would need no protection) to be agreeable.
If it's truly so important that they be protected under the law, I think this to be a fine rendition for a new lawset.
It's just funny to be a Lizard/Cow/Roach and be told, "You know, you're not human so the AI can kill you at any time."
Ultimately, It hasn't been a problem, so why make it into one.