Posts: 445
Threads: 68
Joined: Mar 2014
1. Should not be makeable by using an emag on a robot frame. This makes the roboticist specific traitor item worthless. Emagging a frame should make an emagged borg.
2. Should not be killswitchable.
Thoughts?
Posts: 2,612
Threads: 147
Joined: Oct 2012
1. Yes.
2. Fairly sure they don't appear on the robotics controls whatsoever?
3. Put a syndiborg suit on the syndicate shuttle
Posts: 445
Threads: 68
Joined: Mar 2014
Syndieborgs got killswitched last round I was in. It's a problem!
3 would be nice if you could debrain an op without their microbomb going off, wouldn't it!
For some reason I think nukeops always explode even if their microbomb is removed. Maybe that's fixed?
Posts: 2,612
Threads: 147
Joined: Oct 2012
06-22-2016, 01:40 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-22-2016, 01:43 PM by Sundance. Edited 1 time in total.)
Hmmm seems you have more than one bug on your hands.
Firstly syndiborgs most definitely were not on the robotics computer when implemented. Wiki says so.
Secondly nuke ops have surgery equipment that allows them to remove the microbomb and debrain a dude. I'm certain that bug was fixed, as I removed one from a nuke op not too long ago and no boom, but by all means test it again.
Posts: 2,722
Threads: 143
Joined: Sep 2012
BYOND Username: Powmonkey
06-22-2016, 02:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-22-2016, 03:02 PM by Noah Buttes. Edited 1 time in total.)
If syndiborgs are showing on the control computer, that's definitely a bug.
Edit: To add, I totally agree with removing the ability for emags to make syndieborgs. I also agree with putting a syndieborg frame on the nuclear shuttle.
I also think that emags shouldn't affect syndieborgs. You'd be surprised how many times I've been emagged despite being a syndicate borg.
It might be a good idea for syndieborgs to get some unique tools so they can actually do some damage in order to justify their relatively high individual cost compared to mass emagged borgs.
Posts: 1,526
Threads: 36
Joined: Jun 2013
06-22-2016, 05:26 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-22-2016, 05:30 PM by misto. Edited 1 time in total.)
damn, i never knew emags could do that. why would anyone blow crystals on single borgsuits or the conversion chamber when this is objectively the best and most flexible option?
(06-22-2016, 02:42 PM)Noah Buttes Wrote: I also think that emags shouldn't affect syndieborgs. You'd be surprised how many times I've been emagged despite being a syndicate borg.
It might be a good idea for syndieborgs to get some unique tools so they can actually do some damage in order to justify their relatively high individual cost compared to mass emagged borgs.
syndieborgs should come with sunglasses effect type eyes, so it takes more than just a flash to stop them in their tracks
Posts: 5,708
Threads: 303
Joined: May 2014
Honestly, I'd be in favor of syndie borgs getting some major fuck shit up items as part of a module unique to them and just raising the TC cost accordingly
Posts: 2,722
Threads: 143
Joined: Sep 2012
BYOND Username: Powmonkey
(06-22-2016, 05:56 PM)Frank_Stein Wrote: Honestly, I'd be in favor of syndie borgs getting some major fuck shit up items as part of a module unique to them and just raising the TC cost accordingly
Same here.
Posts: 66
Threads: 7
Joined: Jan 2013
BYOND Username: Funk-Tech Operative 1
I'm all for making syndieborgs not killswitchable, that's a neat idea
Posts: 577
Threads: 72
Joined: Dec 2013
BYOND Username: Erev
All for both removing the emag-ability of frames and adding special syndiborg options for TC cost and adding a syndiborg frame to nuke ops shuttle.
Posts: 2,552
Threads: 33
Joined: Oct 2014
I like this syndicate borg buffing talk. Also majorly into ditching emagged frames. I never understood why that was a thing given how useful emags are.
Posts: 1,072
Threads: 93
Joined: Aug 2014
Never knew about the emagging frames thing. That's dumb and I agree it should probably go, it outclasses the other roboticist options by a mile. Emagging borgs to turn them lawless should still stay, though. As for kill switching, I don't think syndieborg frames ordered via tcs even show up on the robotics computer - if they are then that's almost certainly a bug.
I like the idea of syndieborgs being able to be emagged, though. Chances are you're not going to have the same person making borgs and emagging them, so it's usually the outcome of at least two traitor plans intersecting, which is always fun. An emag isn't a precision hacking tool, after all, just a 'fuck electronics up' card.
And yes to syndieborgs getting buffed, please.
Posts: 1,032
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
(06-22-2016, 12:54 PM)Grayshift Wrote: 1. Should not be makeable by using an emag on a robot frame. This makes the roboticist specific traitor item worthless. Emagging a frame should make an emagged borg.
2. Should not be killswitchable.
Thoughts?
Posts: 464
Threads: 12
Joined: Nov 2012
BYOND Username: Xeram
Syndieborgs made by emagging frames most certainly appear on the Robotics Console, as I was recently killswitched to death as one. It'd be understandable if it was an emagged robot, which is basically a station borg that's been broken, but syndieborgs are syndicate....creation things on a seperate lawset from the station AI, makes no sense that a robotics console connected to the station's borgs can affect them.
Posts: 445
Threads: 68
Joined: Mar 2014
06-23-2016, 03:17 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-23-2016, 09:31 AM by Grayshift. Edited 1 time in total.)
Good news: I think I've written a patch that does this.
Bad news: I need to test it and have no idea how to do that.
I'll do some questioning later. If we can also confirm that nukeop implant removal is also working, I'll ask about getting the borg frame on the syndie shuttle upgraded.
I like that idea of syndieborgs getting a custom module or buff but that's beyond the scope of what I'm trying to do here.
Edit:
http://forum.ss13.co/showthread.php?tid=6608