12-21-2017, 04:03 PM
I need to raise a concern that by setting the precedent that a single proposal can both change the mutability and amend the same rule, you essentially make mutability meaningless, as any proposal which means to amend an immutable rule, regardless of the mechanism that endows it with that property, could easily just invoke a second clause to change that mutability - unless you amend 103 to specifically prohibit the type of amendment youve proposed. which would be a pretty congressman thing to do.