Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why security can do not good
#7
I'll List the what I've been through and what I've seen, though by my standards I'm new so Don't go entirely by what I say.
-Some People, when they are Sec and the round gets boring, go Supercop and Arrest people for as Little as Possible, Eg Stunning the Clown, and perma brigging them for De-gunning the Det who was Shooting them...
-Some people are just a Bit Shit as Sec; for example As Clown, I've been beaten, Flashed 'till blind, Straight jacket'd, Buckle cuffed, De-Limb'd, Space'd, Strangled to death, and perma brigged in my NON antag clown rounds for Pranks(Freeze throwers, Grabbing the Buffer and Cleaning Long Stretches of hall, Routing pipe traps to the test chamber... Ect).
-Some People Don't Care about maintaining Order, and just want guns.
-Decent officers are Rare to Come by, and are Killed off more often then the shit ones Because they are not "Shoot first, Space if they had anything I Wanted"
-The Sec Officer most trusted, is the one which is around when a Ling starts dragging you off... and Actually acts rather then letting him go off into maint.
-People don't trust the guy wearing a Bullet resistant vest and carrying around a taser, because the chances of an officer Letting go of an Antag who beat you into crit and left you to Die, are higher then the guy who was Mugged and beat the shit out of a guy to get his ID back for some strange reason.
-There are four Types of cops,
*Noobs: the people just trying out sec with little experience with the game, No body trusts them, they are the type of people to Declare open season on the clown's head for Metal foaming Sec, they don't look at the chat log... they arn't bad because they are trying to be, just VERY misguided.
*Abusers: The People who think Sec>Captain and Don't really care who is an Antag as long as they get a gun, they probably have some to a lot of Experience, Some people who benefit from them being there Trust 'em, They Shoot people for minor issues and "Forget" to set a brig time, They can read whats going on and view it in the way that best helps 'em. They might as well be Shitsec because they are the guys who Cut off your legs for Slipping 'em and Beat you into crit if you have any sort of gun.
*Do-Gooders: the people who Take sec because they want to help, they are the least trusted form of sec, they are the guys who respond when you call for help... and are also the guys the 'ling will lure off and eat because he can. When it isn't Ling they are likely the best form of Sec.
*Clown Cop: Either the Captain was handing out all access or he Got it himself, but so long as he isn't shooting his fellow Sec he is the Most trusted form of sec, they are the guys who Shoot the antag, Strip 'em, Loot 'em, and make 'em disappear before they know whats going on... but have a Decent chance of being the antag themselves.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why security can do not good - by Technature - 05-26-2017, 08:05 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Sundance - 05-26-2017, 09:21 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Ed Venture - 05-26-2017, 12:37 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Frank_Stein - 05-26-2017, 12:44 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Berrik - 05-26-2017, 05:24 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Technature - 05-26-2017, 05:44 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Crazyabe - 05-26-2017, 08:40 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Lady Birb - 05-26-2017, 08:53 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Mageziya - 05-26-2017, 09:18 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Berrik - 05-26-2017, 09:44 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by misto - 05-26-2017, 11:11 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Roomba - 05-26-2017, 11:17 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Technature - 05-27-2017, 02:32 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Berrik - 05-27-2017, 01:31 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Ed Venture - 05-27-2017, 03:15 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Dr Zoidcrab - 05-27-2017, 06:16 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by misto - 05-27-2017, 06:37 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Technature - 05-27-2017, 05:17 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Nnystyxx - 05-27-2017, 07:25 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Frank_Stein - 05-27-2017, 07:27 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by misto - 05-27-2017, 07:31 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Ed Venture - 05-27-2017, 12:20 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Lady Birb - 05-27-2017, 12:58 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Ed Venture - 05-27-2017, 02:25 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Berrik - 05-27-2017, 02:44 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by misto - 05-27-2017, 02:50 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Frank_Stein - 05-27-2017, 05:14 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Vitatroll - 05-27-2017, 05:35 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Huff H Law - 05-27-2017, 06:13 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by YoukCat - 05-28-2017, 10:52 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by atamusvaleo - 05-31-2017, 06:42 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Frank_Stein - 05-31-2017, 08:44 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Superlagg - 05-31-2017, 12:00 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Frank_Stein - 05-31-2017, 12:21 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Technature - 05-31-2017, 02:43 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Vitatroll - 05-31-2017, 11:31 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Sundance - 05-31-2017, 11:39 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Lady Birb - 05-31-2017, 11:57 AM
RE: Why security can do not good - by Noah Buttes - 05-31-2017, 12:09 PM
RE: Why security can do not good - by atamusvaleo - 06-01-2017, 06:05 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)