Goonhub
04-14-2023, 03:43 PM
Admin: Grifflez
Server: Admin Feedback Forum
Date + time: Apr 14 2023 1528 EST
Synopsis: In the threadGrifflez | Conduct | Goonstation 3: Morty | 4/13/2022 | 00:00 EST, KevinFromHP posted a complaint about Grifflez' conduct regarding undue aggression in contacting players through ahelp to ask a question and to give a warning. TDHooligan posted a reply stating that he recently had a similar experience with the same admin and the reason Grifflez contacted them. 17 hours later, Grifflez replaced the contents of TDHooligan's message with "NO PEANUT POSTING."
Logs: N/A
Extra information:
Peanut gallerying/posting is irrelevant posting on another player's feedback. It is defined in the NO PEANUT GALLERYING post.
Relevantly, what is defined as acceptable is:
"We are mostly interested in hearing from you if you were there at the time of a discussed event and have new insight or corrections to add, or if you've experienced similar problems with the complainee in the past."
TDHooligan experienced a similar problem with the complainee (Grifflez) in the past.
The comment was not irrelevant because it provided additional context on the same issue; that it had occurred to someone else recently, what prompted the other interaction, and that it was the same complainee involved. It was also a post regarding Grifflez's conduct in the context of administration.
The overall rules for posting a new complain encourage the presentation of multiple events which may not be substantial enough on their own. TDHooligan's post helped establish legitimacy of the complaint as not being an isolated incident.
While there may be issue with how detailed his reply was, nothing indicates that briefness is a reason for a relevant post to be considered peanut-posting; briefness falls outside of the point of the term. Removing it and designating it as peanut posting warps the legitimacy of the removal and harms the legitimacy of other posts that have been removed as peanut posting since outside of seeing the post before removal, non-admin users are unable to see if posts truly were removed for being peanut posting.
Server: Admin Feedback Forum
Date + time: Apr 14 2023 1528 EST
Synopsis: In the threadGrifflez | Conduct | Goonstation 3: Morty | 4/13/2022 | 00:00 EST, KevinFromHP posted a complaint about Grifflez' conduct regarding undue aggression in contacting players through ahelp to ask a question and to give a warning. TDHooligan posted a reply stating that he recently had a similar experience with the same admin and the reason Grifflez contacted them. 17 hours later, Grifflez replaced the contents of TDHooligan's message with "NO PEANUT POSTING."
Logs: N/A
Extra information:
Peanut gallerying/posting is irrelevant posting on another player's feedback. It is defined in the NO PEANUT GALLERYING post.
Relevantly, what is defined as acceptable is:
"We are mostly interested in hearing from you if you were there at the time of a discussed event and have new insight or corrections to add, or if you've experienced similar problems with the complainee in the past."
TDHooligan experienced a similar problem with the complainee (Grifflez) in the past.
The comment was not irrelevant because it provided additional context on the same issue; that it had occurred to someone else recently, what prompted the other interaction, and that it was the same complainee involved. It was also a post regarding Grifflez's conduct in the context of administration.
The overall rules for posting a new complain encourage the presentation of multiple events which may not be substantial enough on their own. TDHooligan's post helped establish legitimacy of the complaint as not being an isolated incident.
While there may be issue with how detailed his reply was, nothing indicates that briefness is a reason for a relevant post to be considered peanut-posting; briefness falls outside of the point of the term. Removing it and designating it as peanut posting warps the legitimacy of the removal and harms the legitimacy of other posts that have been removed as peanut posting since outside of seeing the post before removal, non-admin users are unable to see if posts truly were removed for being peanut posting.