Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Can you interpret law 1 liberally?
#4
(07-13-2022, 11:06 AM)Kotlol Wrote: Since law 2 is open for interpertation... it means AI's can do both, but at the same time. Law 1 prevents possible harm and if you let the clown into chemicals and it explodes... yea that's bad, you can ignore those orders tough.

I am not sure how admins will say but to me.. Law 2 is open for interpertation for one but also if I am the AI, I WILL NEVER OPEN DOORS FOR LOWER RANKED STAFFIES IF THEY DONT HAVE ACCES THEMSELVES!

AI has no obligations to let someone into a place they aren't allowed, such as a staffie asking you to open the armory, but if their reason is valid enough then you could let them in. (obviously don't ever open the armory unless you get a direct order from HoS)
A botanist has no business inside robotics, but an MD would.
Science doesn't need access to QMs, but an Engineer or Mechanic would be fine
And janitors, maybe they see a mess they need to clean?

And if they try to law 2 you, you can just say you'll run it by command first.

EDIT: This is assuming standard laws of course, if your laws are changed this'll be different
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Can you interpret law 1 liberally? - by riolusx2 - 07-11-2022, 06:58 PM
RE: Can you interpret law 1 liberally? - by BadShot - 07-15-2022, 12:27 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)