Poll: Yes or No?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
32.00%
8 32.00%
No
20.00%
5 20.00%
It should be launched into the sun instead
48.00%
12 48.00%
Total 25 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Failsafe switch for Research.
#10
(05-17-2019, 05:02 AM)Triacontakai Wrote: Like Ursula said, literally the entire point of the station's existence is research. It wouldn't make sense to have provisions to lock that stuff down.

The station clearly only exists as a tax dodge for NanoTrasen, since no actual research takes place in Research. Even the Artifact Lab only cares about turning the things on, not how or why they work.

Besides being funny, the other reason I'm suggesting this is to give an incentive for science to toe the line. Being selected as a traitor scientist is like winning the lottery. You have a million ways to fuck up the station with zero oversight, conveniently located in a nice, secluded part of the station where your colleagues don't ask too many questions as long as you don't touch their stuff. In my ideal station, the Research Director is nervously patrolling the halls to ensure he does not get flushed out the airlock along with his office.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Failsafe switch for Research. - by Vengarr - 05-16-2019, 03:12 PM
RE: Failsafe switch for Research. - by The Gorog - 05-16-2019, 03:20 PM
RE: Failsafe switch for Research. - by SRQ - 05-16-2019, 04:07 PM
RE: Failsafe switch for Research. - by Vengarr - 05-16-2019, 06:20 PM
RE: Failsafe switch for Research. - by drWoof - 05-16-2019, 11:46 PM
RE: Failsafe switch for Research. - by Dauntasa - 05-17-2019, 05:53 AM
RE: Failsafe switch for Research. - by Vengarr - 05-17-2019, 06:08 AM
RE: Failsafe switch for Research. - by Technature - 05-17-2019, 09:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)