05-10-2017, 10:51 AM
Ah. That perspective makes more sense, at least. I figured he was saying that traitors would be disadvantaged. Not sure which it was, but I'll operate on the second notion.
Anyways, I still disagree with it. You're far more likely to run into a situation where the traitor has 5 tasers and you have 0 than one where you're both armed with tasers. If that isn't true, then you likely play Sec, Captain, HoP, or HoS a lot. In other words, the majority of crewmembers are SOL either way. Restricted tasers just make them less so.
I'm not against makeshift weapons, mind. I just didn't get the argument.
Anyways, I still disagree with it. You're far more likely to run into a situation where the traitor has 5 tasers and you have 0 than one where you're both armed with tasers. If that isn't true, then you likely play Sec, Captain, HoP, or HoS a lot. In other words, the majority of crewmembers are SOL either way. Restricted tasers just make them less so.
I'm not against makeshift weapons, mind. I just didn't get the argument.