04-17-2017, 11:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-17-2017, 11:51 AM by Ginseng. Edited 1 time in total.)
I'd be happy to explain a bit more, but I think first, it's a good idea to acknowledge a breach of a legal binding process, as being quite serious, instead of expecting it to be amusing. But that's just my opinion.
The game in question is using the admin PM system, along with several complicated algorithms, to help it function, then claiming that it's all original code and their own, whilst simultaneously accepting money from the ~120 player base. If that's not a breach, and highly amusing, then maybe I came to the wrong forum about the issue.
In case anyone was wondering, I have the code they are using, vs the Goonstation code, and it's an exact match.
I was hoping to message an admin privately about the issue, or someone involved with the legal proceedings, to help avoid the situation blowing up.
The game in question is using the admin PM system, along with several complicated algorithms, to help it function, then claiming that it's all original code and their own, whilst simultaneously accepting money from the ~120 player base. If that's not a breach, and highly amusing, then maybe I came to the wrong forum about the issue.
In case anyone was wondering, I have the code they are using, vs the Goonstation code, and it's an exact match.
I was hoping to message an admin privately about the issue, or someone involved with the legal proceedings, to help avoid the situation blowing up.