04-11-2017, 10:39 AM
(04-11-2017, 10:35 AM)Technature Wrote: I've been thinking on this Mini-admin thing, and this is what I've come up with.
The person is able to issue something I'm calling a "Ban note" from here on. A person who gets a note sends a message to an Admin to look at and they can determine if it's worth taking action on. The note itself would include why that person thinks they should be talked to, and there must be a reason for it.
Alternatively, "Ban Votes". Certain people who can be trusted are given the ability to place a Ban vote on a player, and when it reaches a certain threshold (Based on the current population of such players but never lower than 3, something like 75% of what's there) the person is given a ban that lasts a few hours. This requires that several people confirm that the person is being an annoying shit that's ruining peoples rounds. Of course, it needs to be monitored so that people who try to abuse it are punished.
I'm thinking that requirements for either one should include Being around for a decent amount of time (Like I dunno...three months?) and not having the reputation for being a constant asshole. I'm sure the Admins alone are capable of determining this, but if possible public consent can be made in the same way via HoS or Mentor apps.
Given that mentors are deemed "not shit", why not use them for whatever variant of the banhammer/ban-slap-on-the-wrist is worked out?