Goonhub
12-20-2016, 12:58 PM
Sticking to the original scope of the proposal, only 4 nonhead/MD jobs are especially affected/debated:
Roboticists: community generally seems to be on the side of 'keep access', I think enough of their job requires them to basically be backup doctors as well that I agree.
Janitors: Community generally seems to be on the side of 'remove access', a stance I more or less agree with.
Geneticists: Opinions divided, I don't think they especially require it but seeing as how they almost never interact with anything outside of genetics ever, am fairly neutral on the subject.
Sec/debt: the main sticking point of the thread, and since I don't play sec/MD often I'll stay out of that particular debate.
Roboticists: community generally seems to be on the side of 'keep access', I think enough of their job requires them to basically be backup doctors as well that I agree.
Janitors: Community generally seems to be on the side of 'remove access', a stance I more or less agree with.
Geneticists: Opinions divided, I don't think they especially require it but seeing as how they almost never interact with anything outside of genetics ever, am fairly neutral on the subject.
Sec/debt: the main sticking point of the thread, and since I don't play sec/MD often I'll stay out of that particular debate.