Goonhub
11-29-2016, 10:04 AM
I don't have a problem with these laws per se, but argueing the vagueness and loopholes of space law isn't necessaraly a bad thing; they are no where near the same level as AI lawset, one is mandatory, the other is to the spirit of it.
I'd argue that it'd be better to lump in the drugs with "Possesion", disruption of the workplace could fall under "Harassment" or "Gross Negligence", and animal abuse could be argued as "Gross Negligence", but could fall under a wider branch of "Destruction of Property", which is akin to Grand Theft.
I'd also argue that if there's a need for security to crack down on drugs or murder of animals, then it'd probably be a better idea for having security (heck nevermind security, the detective literally has nothing to do), more busy, whether that be where random events were they are actually required, or a low % of hardmode traitor to really have security something to do (1-2 Hardmode Traitors per 15-20)
I'd argue that it'd be better to lump in the drugs with "Possesion", disruption of the workplace could fall under "Harassment" or "Gross Negligence", and animal abuse could be argued as "Gross Negligence", but could fall under a wider branch of "Destruction of Property", which is akin to Grand Theft.
I'd also argue that if there's a need for security to crack down on drugs or murder of animals, then it'd probably be a better idea for having security (heck nevermind security, the detective literally has nothing to do), more busy, whether that be where random events were they are actually required, or a low % of hardmode traitor to really have security something to do (1-2 Hardmode Traitors per 15-20)