Goonhub
11-05-2016, 07:17 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-05-2016, 07:18 AM by Roomba. Edited 1 time in total.)
(11-04-2016, 05:34 PM)zewaka Wrote: This is why both the sploded clause exists and Rule 10: "This is not an exhaustive list. Rules-lawyering is STRONGLY discouraged. If an admin asks you to knock something off, 'well it's not in the rules' is not really an argument. If you feel this rule is being abused, please feel absolutely free to make use of the Admin Complaints forum - we won't punish you for posting a complaint."
That's a line of thought that's mentioned a lot and invoked very rarely - I'm sure most people can probably name two or three active players that qualify off the top of their heads right now. In almost all cases like this, it usually ends up with the abuseable feature removed rather than the offending player, so why not nip this one in the bud and just not have the abuseable feature in the first place?
E: there are literally people brainstorming ways to abuse it right now, here in this thread (presumably jokingly, but I'm sure more than one person is going to quietly see if that actually works later on)