Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Incorrect Secure safe / Ship Lock code responses
#4
I think VoxSerico is just saying pod-specific is broken; secure safes should be fine. I didn't know pod locks were any different, honestly.

On secure safes I just use selective brute force. Going from 0000-XXXX and finding the grumpy beep (the first place) and other valid symbols (other beeps). Then I brute force the last three places.

That is: Grumpy beep is 4 and valid symbols are 2, 2 (double beep) and 5. Enter 4, then 2 2 5, then 2 5 2, then 5 2 2 - success. It doesn't take long.

Looks like pods are made a bit harder.


Messages In This Thread
RE: Incorrect Secure safe / Ship Lock code responses - by Vitatroll - 09-03-2016, 01:27 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)