07-28-2016, 10:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-28-2016, 10:39 PM by fosstar. Edited 4 times in total.
Edit Reason: memes
)
Quick explanation:the anon3 amendment would allow more players to assist on the ban appeal process, this covers this:
"Rule 3 says no metagaming, not no greifing"
"These admins have always allowed floorpilling"
"you posted in 4chan bragging about metacomming with shittymcgreifier"
This does not cover:
"This happened to me once and I didn't get banned for it" or the reverse "This happened to me once and I got banned for it."
"My opinion is…" or "I feel like…"
see here for more details:tg ban appeal rules
arguments for this:
it would allow competent players who know the rules to help with the ban appeal process.
it would allow players to point to a rule, precedent, or piece of evidence that was missed by the poster or admins
arguments against this:
it could lead to shitposting
it could cause cluttered ban appeal threads
now, you decide, is this a good idea?
"Rule 3 says no metagaming, not no greifing"
"These admins have always allowed floorpilling"
"you posted in 4chan bragging about metacomming with shittymcgreifier"
This does not cover:
"This happened to me once and I didn't get banned for it" or the reverse "This happened to me once and I got banned for it."
"My opinion is…" or "I feel like…"
see here for more details:tg ban appeal rules
arguments for this:
it would allow competent players who know the rules to help with the ban appeal process.
it would allow players to point to a rule, precedent, or piece of evidence that was missed by the poster or admins
arguments against this:
it could lead to shitposting
it could cause cluttered ban appeal threads
now, you decide, is this a good idea?