04-29-2016, 08:05 PM
I never even got how > and mfw became a thing outside of 2chan-styled imageboards. mfw is for reaction images and > is a website-specific quoting style. Using them in a place that allows for neither is the equivalent of saying lol in response to someone's joke.
With regards to cuck I'd figure it'd be against the 'creepy'/sexually charged rule anyways.
With regards to cuck I'd figure it'd be against the 'creepy'/sexually charged rule anyways.