07-19-2015, 01:20 PM
This is why I did not think there would be a balancing issue. At most I could see it only holding one taser or baton not both.
This was the very idea in a nutshell, to make item management easier on security and for the Heads of Security to stop wasting time with the handcuff boxes.
Just like last time I feel Sundance's idea for the sec belt is the best way to go, the PDA idea along with the sec belt is a great idea.
Dr_Bee Wrote:a special security belt would basically just be a quality of life improvement over a balance one. plus it would leave more tool belts for everyone else.
This was the very idea in a nutshell, to make item management easier on security and for the Heads of Security to stop wasting time with the handcuff boxes.
Sundance Wrote:For the naysayers:
It functions no differently than other belts. Medical and mining belt can hold larger objects of their job class that otherwise wouldn't fit in a box.
Furthermore, utility belts already function somewhat as a sec belt. They can hold small items, which means you can bring store cuffs, flashbangs, flashes and pdas. Adding in a belt that's restricted one weapon (gun or a baton) and giving it the ability to still receive messages from a pda would make item organisation far better.
Just like last time I feel Sundance's idea for the sec belt is the best way to go, the PDA idea along with the sec belt is a great idea.

Goonhub