The Relationship Between Traitors and the HoS

[Ed Venture]

I now see the folly of my attitude towards this. I still would have not have executed the dude but understand that he had it coming. I apologize for the unnecessary and quite rude rant towards you Sham Poo.

Unpopular opinion: Even the Gestapo is more fun than the hugbox.

More fun for whom?
The entire reasoning behind the shift was because the Gestapo was unfun for the traitors, as people were tired of their rounds being cut short by zealous shithead officers.
Besides, my argument wasn't that either the gestapo/hugbox were good, I was stating that both were bad. We need a happy medium.

Hugbox is silly and I feel like I've contributed to that mindset, bluh.
Here are some disjointed rambling thoughts on crime and punishment:

• HoS's ought to be both a lethally dangerous adversary and a voice of reason.
  
• If you attack an HoS with apparently lethal intent, don't fuckin' cry about it when you lose.
  
• Same for the detective or anyone else, really. Traitor tip #1: never fight fair.
  
• I'd hoped putting VR stuff, mail, computers and stuff in the brig would give prisoners something to do.
  
• Maybe we should revise the general suggested arrest times upwards a little. <5min seems laughably pointless, but obviously Bay's 1-4 hour sentences won't work.
  
• If you can stun and capture someone, that is generally preferable vs. summary execution.
  
• 'legit kills' are an awful and toxic concept
  
• generally speaking, deadchat is full of sore losers and chumps
  
• for fuck's sake don't let captured traitors just have all their lethal toys back, but maybe do let them know where it went
  
• aughhhhh

This pretty much is a good example on it but I also agree with Marquesas that a much harsher tone needs to be brought to the table when dealing with traitors, depending on the severity of their crimes of course. I've spent sometime reflecting on that round while reading this thread and it really open my eyes on things.