The Good Sec Thread(tm)

[Shoddy]

I don't really have the time to reply right now because btek's post is pretty thoughtful and I'd like to give it proper discussion but holy fucking christ Shoddy I don't think you'd recognize sarcasm if it dickslapped you. Let me spell it out real quick: I was using those punishments as specific examples of how you can be shit while still following all of your half-cocked rules. This illustrates the problem with half-cocked rules. No you don't need to spell out why they're bad because we already talked about why they're bad on the first fucking page of this thread.

Your very own posts are proof as to why specific explanations and are needed. I don't know how much more clear you want it to be.

Right, i've gotten over zealous, sorry.
My main point in all my post's is that people don't need extremely specific guides to know how to be a good officer, though i can understand the part about dipshit officers trying to justify their actions by twisting rules.

Though i don't really get how that rule was half cocked, you say that they leave huge gaps for situations and such, why do we assume that people are so dumb to believe that since poisoning someone isn't "technically" beating them, it's ok.

People are alot smarter than we give them credit for and many are just meanies.

Though i would like to apologize for that obvious lack of humor i presented when i replied, sorry man. :oops:

PS: this thread does not seem to be going anywhere but bad places at the moment. not gonna say anymore because i'd probably say what i mean wrong.

Perhaps i am wrong and people are dumb enough to believe that poisoning is better than beatings, in which case i'd be kind of shocked at how stupid people can be.