Goonhub
01-08-2015, 08:36 AM
I replied in the appeal thread, but I will explain myself more clearly here.
The admin log showed you arming the bomb. This was due to lag, as you explained. But the only reason I suspected you at all, was because the admin log showed YOU arming it. I looked at your notes, saw you had a history of griefing, so I attempted to contact you. I could not, so I banned you. All I ever wanted was your side of the story, but I fully admit I took your history into account, as I always do, with anyone. I can appreciate that you might have gotten screwed over by the system this time, and am dropping the ban after hearing your side.
EDIT: It's worth noting that I wasn't angry you weren't responding. Adding that line is pretty common when a person is not responding the PMs after an incident. It didn't factor in to the ban at all, it was just a note to show that I did try to contact you, rather than ban you without giving you a chance to defend yourself.
The admin log showed you arming the bomb. This was due to lag, as you explained. But the only reason I suspected you at all, was because the admin log showed YOU arming it. I looked at your notes, saw you had a history of griefing, so I attempted to contact you. I could not, so I banned you. All I ever wanted was your side of the story, but I fully admit I took your history into account, as I always do, with anyone. I can appreciate that you might have gotten screwed over by the system this time, and am dropping the ban after hearing your side.
EDIT: It's worth noting that I wasn't angry you weren't responding. Adding that line is pretty common when a person is not responding the PMs after an incident. It didn't factor in to the ban at all, it was just a note to show that I did try to contact you, rather than ban you without giving you a chance to defend yourself.