07-03-2014, 07:41 AM
bubs Wrote:I dont really care bout longevity or whatever, go with whatever servers run better, but it's far superior to have one server with 15 and one with 50 than three with 5 and one with 50
Sundance Wrote:I agree with bubs. I called for shutting down the servers before it became fashionable. It's really a case of less is more at the moment.Yeah I disagree with this argument. Look at this shit.
I'd think it'd be much more logical to just have two servers, one european and one american. There'll always be a fuller one, but it'll be around 40:15 rather than 40:3. This way if you die or get bored at least you have another server to go to.
The popular server doesn't just have 40 or 50 people, it has 60 goddamn people as of this post. Yesterday it had 70 people. I wish I screencapped that. The idea that once a server gets to 40 to 50 that people will just jump to the other server seems pretty bullshit. They just keep piling into the one.
Again, server cap. If it's possible, it should really be considered.