12-22-2013, 09:01 AM
Dauntasa Wrote:UrsulaMejor Wrote:i'm honestly in favour of making sec weapons more lethal just so that Sec is more likely to ignore really petty things because it'd be tricky to stop them with just a baton and not worth it to gun them downClarks Wrote:It's pretty funny how people ask for bigger tasers. There's the revolvers too now, with real bullets.How to spot a bad officer: they're using lethal force.
Revolvers should be a weapon of last resort, not a replacement taser
I haven't been able to play, but am I right in thinking that sec get access to revolvers with bleeding damage, i.e: Lethal force?
I'm getting deja vu here.. I encourage anyone who doesn't know what I'm talking about to skim over this thread, the thread about removing eguns: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1496&hilit=riot+shotguns
So basically we've moved from:
"Lethal's bad, stuns are good!"
to
"Stuns are lame, Bullets are fun!"

Yeah, I like the idea of prolonging gunfights, and making it fun for both parties.
But we're blurring the lines when security starts pulling revolvers on traitors who are doing the same. Security don't need revolvers, we need tasers that don't fuck up traitors fights so radically, without security first-hand arsenal being nerfed to shit. Unless we want the new brig to be the morgue.