Feedback Request for Clarification on RP Rule 1.

[chrisboidudeman]

I was the admin in both scenarios mentioned in example 5, the first scenario the assistants were just stood outside the bridge demanding higher pay and most importantly not committing other crimes, until I felt it had reached a good point, detonated a rev flashbang, and they all were then antagonists, importantly after being brigged and counterrev implanted, they knocked it off. In the second scenario several other crimes were taking place among the group and they did not stop after briggings. There was no conflicting decisions this was two differing scenarios in which one group stopped when told to (via brigging) and the other did not.

I'm glad you chimed into this jorj, because my memory of the event is different. I witnessed multiple crimes, including security assistants getting pinned down and robbed of their flash, vandalism, and even a murder via poisoning took place before the flashbang went off during the first event. Comparable to the second event where nobody was injured. Security also demanded the staff assistants disperse multiple times during the first event which was ignored. According to Mordent this means the first protest was rule breaking but according to you it was not. Hence the need for clarification.

As the overseeing admin both times, is it your understanding that the level of crime or circumstance is largely irrelevant as long as they stop when asked? In that case I'd love for insight on example 6 specifically, another event I see in some form very frequently leading up to the holidays.