Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 2.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Guys, is this a terrible idea?
#4
Good idea.

Gives AI "maintenance" to perform so stops them being a constant snoop, whilst allowing them to sacrifice maintenance time for assisitnig with situations etc.

Failing checks causes vision radius of AI eye / shells to reduce by one (a reduction of the total squares visible by one at each border, stacks), maybe extending to each camera, but that may cause choppy vision which would be annoying to see.

Id say allowing the crew to manually fix the glitches is a bit eeh - as that then puts the responsibility on others to fix your lateness / mistakes. Completing tasks should reduce the negative effects over time if done in succession.

That said, it sounds like itdd be awful to code said objectives and make them automatically tracked without making them either predictable (Oh, the AI has a command stamp in their core? must be an objective) or law rack check bait (AI why did you order a bathroom crate from cargo?). Also, I can imagine itdd be F1 hell for "hey I did my objective but the tracking failed what gives?"

Would be interesting to compile a list of tasks, and consequences though, just to see what sticks to the wall.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Guys, is this a terrible idea? - by kyle2143 - 09-27-2025, 11:24 PM
RE: Guys, is this a terrible idea? - by ZeWaka - 09-28-2025, 12:33 AM
RE: Guys, is this a terrible idea? - by NOOT - 09-28-2025, 12:52 AM
RE: Guys, is this a terrible idea? - by JORJ949 - 09-28-2025, 01:36 AM
RE: Guys, is this a terrible idea? - by Kotlol - 09-28-2025, 03:54 AM
RE: Guys, is this a terrible idea? - by RSOD - 09-28-2025, 04:57 AM
RE: Guys, is this a terrible idea? - by mralexs - 09-28-2025, 06:49 PM
RE: Guys, is this a terrible idea? - by NOOT - 09-30-2025, 03:29 PM
RE: Guys, is this a terrible idea? - by Whele - 09-30-2025, 06:43 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)