Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NT flamethrowers
#8
(07-09-2025, 08:28 AM)Frank_Stein Wrote: I feel like the advantage of a NT produced flamethrower should be ergonomics if anything. The assembled ones are using pieces that weren't intended to be used that way.

You can't stow it without disassembling it, so maybe the NT one should be smaller and more compact.

I dunno, maybe the assembled ones oughta be bulkier as well? Either back mounted or two handed to use?

It can be stowed away but it uses an oxygen tank like the gas masks to fuel it's destructive force.
It is two handed however.
But you need to reload it with gas and it needs your oxygen tank to fire.
Just a small trade off from the current one.

You gain stowability but you spend more Oxygen from small oxygen tanks wich only gives it a few shots.... so you want to bring big oxygen tanks on your back to use it... wich counter intuativly makes you unable to stow it back into a backpack.
Just that LIL quirk.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
NT flamethrowers - by RSOD - 07-04-2025, 02:15 PM
RE: NT flamethrowers - by Chasu - 07-04-2025, 10:52 PM
RE: NT flamethrowers - by meaow589 - 07-05-2025, 12:34 AM
RE: NT flamethrowers - by freedo5 - 07-05-2025, 01:08 AM
RE: NT flamethrowers - by Lord_earthfire - 07-05-2025, 01:19 AM
RE: NT flamethrowers - by Skotcher - 07-09-2025, 05:14 AM
RE: NT flamethrowers - by Frank_Stein - 07-09-2025, 08:28 AM
RE: NT flamethrowers - by Kotlol - 07-10-2025, 01:23 AM
RE: NT flamethrowers - by RSOD - 07-10-2025, 06:03 AM
RE: NT flamethrowers - by Taylorstar - 07-10-2025, 01:27 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)