Complaint Inconsistent treatment of "Escalation" and "Staying in lane"

[Selur91]

This post being an indirect ban appeal muddies the waters around the questions of roleplay escalation.

I said it twice already that the post is not a ban appeal, the ban was almost gone when i posted it and I do think it's a fair one since I annoyed some other users. 

The thing I want with this post is some clarification as to what constitutes insuficient escalation and staying in lane. You guys yourselves are saying is highly subjective and context sensitive so I don't think it's that far off to ask, moreover so since a mishap on one of those results in a 12h ban it's not really something you can learn by trial and error.

Also sec did ask for the "random" trials, and the flamethrower had roleplay with many other players, from the robiticst that saw it as a toy, to the MD asking for the purpose and even sec. It was not a hidden thing, everyone knew that Dragaz had it. But again, it's not the point to talk about this particular ban but to try and make some sense out of those rules. Just like griefing is very well tipified in the rules these ones aren't.
And I would love at least one rule of thumb as to how you guys, who are the judges of it, interpret them just so I can stay compliant with the rules.