Goonhub
06-13-2025, 08:06 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2025, 08:06 AM by Katzen. Edited 1 time in total.)
I don't believe it technically falls under rule 4 as there isn't bigotry involved. There has been some related bigotry when people make quotes or references to infamous RL police incidents. I know I have auto piloted into saying "Per rule 4..." when giving a warning about it due to that being the default thing to reference for the frequent language rule breaks we get but that is accidental.
What you are suggesting here is very hypothetical and I don't think there is much value getting into "what if" scenarios. There's a lot of real world topics that we wouldn't want brought up and it's not realistic to make a comprehensive list. The yard stick to measure against is going to be "Hey is this a weird/uncomfortable thing for someone to be talking about?".
Yelling police brutality is very common. As long as security has batons, handcuffs and makes arrests I feel that they will be compared to police. As far as "opening the floodgates" goes players have been getting warnings about it since at least early 2021.
What you are suggesting here is very hypothetical and I don't think there is much value getting into "what if" scenarios. There's a lot of real world topics that we wouldn't want brought up and it's not realistic to make a comprehensive list. The yard stick to measure against is going to be "Hey is this a weird/uncomfortable thing for someone to be talking about?".
Yelling police brutality is very common. As long as security has batons, handcuffs and makes arrests I feel that they will be compared to police. As far as "opening the floodgates" goes players have been getting warnings about it since at least early 2021.