Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A Discussion on Metatrust
#8
(06-10-2025, 04:48 AM)Violetsaber Wrote: In the same vein, metatrust in regards to whitelisted names is absurd. For antags, it is nearly impossible to disguise themselves as a HoS without somebody almost verbatim invoking "I don't recall you getting that promotion" which is thinly disgusied code for "i didn't see you get approved on the forums". Using a fake name and an agent card to the same end is met equally with a total shutout based solely on OOC knowledge, which is then justified by miniscule things out of place. I've heard plenty of stories of HoS players random naming and being met with similar treatment while actually rolling the position.

On the flip side, if you are a known face among security, people will trust you IMMENSELY, real security or not. A few rounds ago as antag, a play to disguise as HoS to get close to the captain to assassinate them was foiled early the second i set foot onto station, the entire security department was called and i got escorted to security. Following this total brick wall of an RP response, i was left with the only choice but to go loud FAR sooner than i wanted, but it ended with me and another traitor killing all of sec almost twice over. Officers were dead and unclonable, their equipment and armory looted, a massive hole in sec and general mayhem. But by merely putting on a red uniform and being recognized by my usual character name, people not only let me be, i was even helped and approached to solve said mayhem that i caused. All while being covered head to toe in stolen, mismatched gear and the blood of my victims.

My point being, it is hard to purposefully forget and ignore things you know. But RP is pretend play where your character is not you, so they can make choices that fit the round. I'm worried that people are too focused on "winning" and doing things "right" rather than actually roleplay. I'd much rather see people make choices based on what role a person is, rather than their name and character appearance. I hope this trend can be course corrected by both ahelping when observed and self correcting. Or mayhaps we should all random name :P

This really made me think. I don't really pay much attention to the people who play certain characters and character names but I think I would recognize most of the HoS ones which play on Sylvester and honestly I think it would be very easy for one of those names to roll antag, disguise themself as HoS and go unnotized by me. There is just so much trust I place in the HoS role that, unless they do something really weird right infront of me or multiple officers report them, I wouldn't even think of them being an antagonist and even then I'd think they where mindhacked, a changeling or similar. I'll try to self correct this and, off course, HoS players are unlikely to "abuse" this, still I think the way HoS is handled as a role both in the community and by the rules invites this sort of thinking.

Besides that I don't really notice this behaviour much on Sylvester, that doesn't make me feel better about it not happening though.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
A Discussion on Metatrust - by Solenoid - 06-09-2025, 07:49 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Drakios - 06-09-2025, 08:33 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Emimiyu - 06-09-2025, 02:19 PM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Solenoid - 06-09-2025, 06:57 PM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by xenomni - 06-09-2025, 03:57 PM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Kotlol - 06-10-2025, 04:04 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Violetsaber - 06-10-2025, 04:48 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Gomp - 06-10-2025, 05:26 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Drakios - 06-10-2025, 12:26 PM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by jan.antilles - 06-10-2025, 09:11 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Emrsnn - 06-10-2025, 01:13 PM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Vulwin_Gilran - 06-10-2025, 09:30 PM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by 444explorer - 06-11-2025, 06:53 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Spyritdragon - 06-13-2025, 03:22 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Cheese - 06-20-2025, 03:20 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by RubberRats - 07-13-2025, 08:32 PM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by The Panna - 07-14-2025, 01:55 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Piesuu - 07-14-2025, 03:28 PM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by RubberRats - 07-14-2025, 04:18 PM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by SnugglyCactus - 07-14-2025, 10:52 PM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Torchwick - 07-15-2025, 02:37 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by JORJ949 - 07-15-2025, 04:04 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Ragemorrow - 07-15-2025, 05:24 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Torchwick - 07-15-2025, 05:50 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by RubberRats - 07-15-2025, 06:55 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by laugoose - 07-15-2025, 09:37 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Emimiyu - 07-23-2025, 02:54 PM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Vulwin_Gilran - 07-23-2025, 06:23 PM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by BioFrequency - 08-05-2025, 05:32 AM
RE: A Discussion on Metatrust - by Shiiba - 08-05-2025, 06:28 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)