Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Security should need to follow laws
#15
(04-08-2025, 03:20 PM)Frank_Stein Wrote: Honestly, I feel the wiki page already does a good enough job and suggesting appropriate punishments with brig times. 

<<Please keep the wiki open at all times to know what to do in game>>
This mentality is what I kinda dislike of SS13 and why it sometimes scares newer players.

Now I do think some things should be red, but the rules are atleast in game.
Space law is in game but you gotta buy it and then read it.

The problem with this system is... not every player has enough monitor space to have a wiki open and the game. This makes them alt tab, look through the wiki to find brigging time and ---
You get it.
Having the right wiki page ready takes time, now you could do it in the 1st 5 mins of a shift sure.
But every time you have to look something up... it's go to the wiki on your browser.

I do agree the rules should be loose, but at the same time... accesiability to them should be easier then look and skim through a book. I think the RP concern would be better if there was easier accesability in game to find this stuff.
For example, a standard form on the walls pointing to standard punishments.
You can still IGNORE THEM, but it would feel nicer if you can just find the stuff that require standards to just be in your hands.

I mean... every engine litterly has a book or pamphlet nearby to tell you how it works.
Botany gets the guide, ranchers get the chart, cargo gets the book, etc etc.
But personally? I rather have some sort of directive on the walls to reference to then "Open the wiki"

Any time a basic function or streamlining should be common knowledge is responded with "open the wiki" I just shudder.
Now looking up advanced stuff on the wiki I don't have to interact with everytime? No problem.
But for standard brig times as security? I don't think the wiki should be the reference everyone has to open every time.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Security should need to follow laws - by Gomp - 04-06-2025, 08:50 AM
RE: Security should need to follow laws - by Gomp - 04-07-2025, 06:43 AM
RE: Security should need to follow laws - by Gomp - 04-08-2025, 07:04 AM
RE: Security should need to follow laws - by Gomp - 04-08-2025, 10:18 AM
RE: Security should need to follow laws - by Gomp - 04-08-2025, 11:21 AM
RE: Security should need to follow laws - by Gomp - 04-09-2025, 12:06 AM
RE: Security should need to follow laws - by Kotlol - 04-09-2025, 01:18 AM
RE: Security should need to follow laws - by Gomp - 04-09-2025, 11:37 AM
RE: Security should need to follow laws - by Gomp - 04-10-2025, 07:03 AM
RE: Security should need to follow laws - by Gomp - 04-10-2025, 10:14 PM
RE: Security should need to follow laws - by Gomp - 04-12-2025, 01:14 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)