Goonhub
03-14-2025, 08:58 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-14-2025, 08:59 AM by Lefinch. Edited 1 time in total.)
I think that's the point developing here. At least so far, the idea itself seems pretty acceptable (though of course others might post later and disagree!) but there's a debate about the sensibility of shuttle cracking. (and while it's not detailed, you could well make an arguement for practicalities too, as a shuttle is PROBABLY quicker? Hard to gauge a system that doesn't exist yet)
Honestly, if you wanted to get rid of cracking and make it more in line with lockers, it wouldn't kill me. Still, I kind of -like- how stupid the shuttles are. This comes entirely from personal miner bias of playing chicken with them in an industrial suit not an objectively neutral view. It is incidentally hilarious that I didn't make the awful nuclear bunker indiana jones joke link till now, but this also helps me feel like I actually just enjoy it because it's a silly fart spaceman physics thing.
But I also don't see it as a hill to die on too, and also don't see the two as mutually exclusive. So I loop back to "yeah sure, why not?" Put it in, put it in and get rid of walnut cracking. Some magic third option, it's all good.
Honestly, if you wanted to get rid of cracking and make it more in line with lockers, it wouldn't kill me. Still, I kind of -like- how stupid the shuttles are. This comes entirely from personal miner bias of playing chicken with them in an industrial suit not an objectively neutral view. It is incidentally hilarious that I didn't make the awful nuclear bunker indiana jones joke link till now, but this also helps me feel like I actually just enjoy it because it's a silly fart spaceman physics thing.
But I also don't see it as a hill to die on too, and also don't see the two as mutually exclusive. So I loop back to "yeah sure, why not?" Put it in, put it in and get rid of walnut cracking. Some magic third option, it's all good.