08-04-2024, 09:05 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-04-2024, 11:26 PM by Lord_earthfire. Edited 9 times in total.)
(08-04-2024, 01:58 PM)Glamurio Wrote: I wouldn't make such broad accusatory statements based off of a forum post exchange and coming to the conclusion that because people raise potential issues with a change they disagree with, that immediately means that anything they don't mention is dismissed or outright rarely occurs. During any shift I've ever been a part of, HoS or not, Security or not, I've seen countless officers ask crewmembers for any information on the subject, such as if they've seen them, if they behaved weirdly, etc.
This statement isn't based solely on this conversation alone, but also on my experience with sec culture on RP in general.
And while yes, the flow of information does work between crew and security, im specifically talking about help on a mechanical level. Being active to help security is highly discouraged and i've encountered dismissive behaviour plenty enough. It even goes so far that you can supply botany produce that is on the same level as robust donuts and it gets declined, telling me its disapproved to accept things from crew.
The cases that are working are the ones where security got specifically no access, like problems with the AI law rack. Or where they are forced to get help, like an engineer checking the power network against wirehopping arcfiends or getting their hands onto salt against wraiths.
Truth be told, i feel like sec on RP do make their situation worse than it is on high pop specifically by not accepting or calling for help more often. In turn, crew should feel less apathic towards antags. When i sometimes hop onto classic i find that this is something that works better over there, simply because the other crewmembers have more responsibility in dealing with antags. And this change can be a nudge to tell everyone "sec can't solve everything for you".