Goonhub
07-12-2024, 10:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-12-2024, 10:43 PM by Lord_earthfire. Edited 2 times in total.)
I think we removed enough stability sources thst we should 1ü0% assume someone to be under 100 stability if they pick one or two reinforced/empowered genes.
Woth hiw stability is right now, this makes active useable mutations unuseable. In an engagement you cannot take a 20 - 30% chance to have a misfire that potentionally takes you out of s fight. Above that, most active mutations are simply weaker than passive ones in general.
Even worse, most active mutations are usefull for antags, while passive mutations are most usefull for non-antags.
Thats why i think we should remove mutation misfire chance.
This makes the danger with stability apply evenly to passive and active mutations. And it makes it feasable go below 100 stability and pick up a few non-stabilized genes.
Woth hiw stability is right now, this makes active useable mutations unuseable. In an engagement you cannot take a 20 - 30% chance to have a misfire that potentionally takes you out of s fight. Above that, most active mutations are simply weaker than passive ones in general.
Even worse, most active mutations are usefull for antags, while passive mutations are most usefull for non-antags.
Thats why i think we should remove mutation misfire chance.
This makes the danger with stability apply evenly to passive and active mutations. And it makes it feasable go below 100 stability and pick up a few non-stabilized genes.