Thread Rating:
  • 22 Vote(s) - 4.09 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
i think it's time to try player caps.
#31
(05-13-2024, 03:09 PM)LeahTheTech Wrote: I'm open to the idea of population caps but I think:
- 65 is too low
- It should only count players in game otherwise people are going to idle on the title screen to "save their spot" and we're going to have 50% idlers/observers taking up the cap
- Classic should either remain uncapped or have a much higher cap as it works a lot better at high (even 100+) populations

Yeah, i share this fully. I wouldn't consider 35 - 45 an ideal number, the player coumt i enjoy the most hovers around 50 - 60. ~35 players is the area where low player interaction departments (rancher, botany, science, genetics) or gimmicks are regulary ignored.

So, i would say its worth a try, but i would suggest the number to 80 and only count player thst are actually in game/observing.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: i think it's time to try player caps. - by Lord_earthfire - 05-13-2024, 11:34 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)