02-21-2024, 03:18 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-21-2024, 03:47 PM by Bananabits111.)
(02-21-2024, 03:09 PM)Adhara In Space Wrote:(02-21-2024, 11:20 AM)Bananabits111 Wrote: Say the player does lie. Have you considered what they could do before getting banned again?
Yes, they could actually break the rules again. But that's the risk we take when we give warnings to people, because most people who are warned take it to heart.
These are some of the judgement calls staff members make when confronting rulebreaking behavior.
Basically, if we say "Stop saying slurs" and someone says "Sorry wont happen again", that's a good outcome for us. If they end up doing it again, we can just ban them. If they don't, then we've got someone who will play and follow the rules.
(02-21-2024, 11:20 AM)Bananabits111 Wrote: And the example with the professor isn't the same as this, because the student doesn't impact anyone else by cheating. Nothing is lost if the student decides to cheat again.That is a flaw in my example. But the intent was to illustrate that the professor decides what to do when the student breaks the rules, and the student lying only matters if they decide to cheat again despite knowing that they'll get caught. Hopefully that helps illustrate what I was trying to get across.
Ok
I guess that makes sense