Goonhub
02-21-2024, 08:33 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-21-2024, 08:42 AM by UrsulaMejor. Edited 1 time in total.)
Did either of you read the conversation in question or are you just upset at the idea of it?
Once someone has been warned, they need to acknowledge the warning. Regardless of what they say, what i care about is if the behavior continues. If they say earnestly say they're going to stop, but then don't stop, the actions are what matter. If, in the moment, they lie about stopping, but then never do it again, that's a win for me.
I am a human being.
Edit: Not to mention, me getting exasperated in a single conversation is not policy. It is a thing that was said in a single conversation, after 13 grueling minutes of someone arguing something that merely needed a 10 second acknowledgement.
I honestly have no idea why you're so stuck on this, when the context makes this obvious and you're basically getting mad over literal nothingness.
Once someone has been warned, they need to acknowledge the warning. Regardless of what they say, what i care about is if the behavior continues. If they say earnestly say they're going to stop, but then don't stop, the actions are what matter. If, in the moment, they lie about stopping, but then never do it again, that's a win for me.
I am a human being.
Edit: Not to mention, me getting exasperated in a single conversation is not policy. It is a thing that was said in a single conversation, after 13 grueling minutes of someone arguing something that merely needed a 10 second acknowledgement.
I honestly have no idea why you're so stuck on this, when the context makes this obvious and you're basically getting mad over literal nothingness.