Goonhub
01-09-2024, 12:05 PM
I think this is an interesting idea. My previous reservations regarding this was that it currently allows for self-selection for that role which adds a twist compared to other determinations of a leader. You are all assigned to a group and someone, if they desire, can opt to take the responsibility of leading the group. This seemed more inline of the social game and gave control to the players.
I do understand there is natural friction if there is conflict over multiple people wanting to be the leader or people being obstinate to taking orders but that seems like a natural consequence of being a social game.
This does seem at least worthwhile to try, what do you all think is really necessary to delineate the leader? Or should this just be a mandatory bonus duty?
I do understand there is natural friction if there is conflict over multiple people wanting to be the leader or people being obstinate to taking orders but that seems like a natural consequence of being a social game.
This does seem at least worthwhile to try, what do you all think is really necessary to delineate the leader? Or should this just be a mandatory bonus duty?