Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 4.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
On the subject of RP Security Officer access
#49
I didn't read aaaaall the discussion, but I quite like the way access works now. Even if security has a pretty good access, often I see them interacting with the department instead of just waking in like they own the place, at least when it's not an emergency/life and death situation. Doing that it's usually read as being unpolite/rude, both in context and in a ooc perspective, where sec can metabuse their access to get stuff that they want when they could ask for it. I have a personal experience where I learned how to fix the paint machine, and would get it fixed on my own almost every shift, silently walking into places, getting what I needed and fixing it, until the CE complained IC that I could ask them for it since it's their job and not mine. I feel the rules "stay in your lane" and "try to roleplay" kinda covers that pretty good. I also feel restraining access would incentive sec to go after insuls and hacking tool "just in case". In my hos experience it's hard enough keeping security toolbox and insuls in security so we have a kit when we need it, and it could get worse with lower access
Edit: The warrant system seems dope tho
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: On the subject of RP Security Officer access - by GuiHppn - 10-23-2023, 06:25 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)