Goonhub
10-20-2023, 01:42 AM
I don't think there is any issue.
Captain has de jure security authority. HoS has de facto.
The HoS page is correct in saying the Head of Security is in charge of security.
The Security Officer page is correct in saying to listen to the HoS - because HoSs have the experience and trust to lead security, and are the ones to look to for how to play security properly.
The Chain of Command page is correct in laying out the chain and who to follow: Captain > Heads > Crew.
Any ambiguity within is part of the game.
Captain has de jure security authority. HoS has de facto.
The HoS page is correct in saying the Head of Security is in charge of security.
The Security Officer page is correct in saying to listen to the HoS - because HoSs have the experience and trust to lead security, and are the ones to look to for how to play security properly.
The Chain of Command page is correct in laying out the chain and who to follow: Captain > Heads > Crew.
Any ambiguity within is part of the game.