09-30-2023, 11:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-30-2023, 11:41 PM by Lord_earthfire. Edited 6 times in total.)
(09-30-2023, 07:50 PM)TDHooligan Wrote: Make oil's ratio always 1-1. Make the reaction rate possibly scale up even further.
(09-30-2023, 07:50 PM)TDHooligan Wrote: Chemists have reverse-engineered every chemistry recipe into their underlying ratios, we saw this with chemgroups...
I think what we saw with chemgroups is very much the reason why we should stop making 1-1 recipes and, in the future, move towards inaccurate and more involved result ratios.
(09-30-2023, 07:50 PM)TDHooligan Wrote: - In fact, if I were to say there was something people grumble right now, it's oil.Iirc the malding over oil ended at the point where the phenol/aceton recipe was changed to take 4 welding fuel and create more products. People don't do oil anyway. They throw welding + carbon,hydrogen + chlorine in, hit it once with a welding tool and make phenol/acetone directly. The ratios conlme out in a way where you need low values of oil to make high quantities of chemicals.
The thing people were complsining for a very long time after the real merge was diethylamine. A bug existed that made the reaction always leave 0.5 of chemicals. That was fixed.
I think currently, from my observation of the discord, people would like to have a seperation method for phenol/aceton, but that's about it what i see on complaints.
My personal gripe recipe is smelling salts of all things, though. It prevents me from making chemgroups that chain the oil/phenol-reaction and the diethylamine reaction, fueled by pyrosium heating (carbon from oil, ammonia from diethylamine and oxygen from pyrosium). But honestly, that is fine, since side-reactions are good way to throw a wrench into your plans.